logoHomeAbout Uscontact usservices and fees

summariesarchivepartners and contributorsposha references

Studies Using POSHA-S:

Attitude Comparisons
Methodological Issues
Reliability
Validity
Translation to Other Languages
Probability vs. Convenience Samples
Sample Size
Changing Attitudes: Stuttering

Pilot Studies using Other POSHA Attributes:

Studies using POSHA-Cl
Studies using POSHA-Mi
Studies using POSHA-Ob

references otherprices and orderingsearch

Studies Using the POSHA-S (Stuttering)

Key:
° - Listed in more than one category
• - POSHA-S used by other researchers

Probability vs. Convenience Samples

Ozdemir, S., Topbas, S., St. Louis, K. O., & Ege, P. (2008, June). Public attitudes toward stuttering: A probability study from Eskisehir, Turkey. Poster presented at the 12th meeting of the International Clinical Phonetics and Linguistics Association. Istanbul, TURKEY.

St. Louis, K. O., Ozdemir, R. S., & Topbas, S. (2009, August). Public attitudes toward stuttering in Turkey: Probability versus convenience sampling. Paper presented at the 6th World Congress of the International Fluency Association. Rio de Janeiro, BRAZIL.

Ozdemir, R. S., St. Louis, K. O., & Topbas, S. (in press). Public attitudes toward stuttering in Turkey: Probability versus convenience sampling. Journal of Fluency Disorders.